PREMIUM FEATURES

A tale of two accounting standards

IF EXXONMOBIL were a European company, its second quarter earnings would have read very differently. It would have copped far more flak than BHP Billiton, BP and BG Group combined, all of which wrote down massive values from their shale assets.

A tale of two accounting standards

Both BP and BG Group took a massive writedown to their US shale reserves that clouded what otherwise would have been a fairly profitable second quarter.

The latest to join the shale asset writedown was BHP, which wrote down as much as $US3 billion from its $5 billion Fayettesville shale acquisition from Chesapeake Energy last year.

In contrast, Exxon, which also made top-of-the-market, and indeed a far pricier purchase of XTO Energy at $US35 billion in 2010, got away without taking a hit on its balance sheet.

The common denominator to these companies is their exposure to shale gas assets in the US, and the plummeting natural gas prices that have eroded much of the reserves value.

However, what separates Exxon from the rest is the accounting rules it follows to measure asset impairment. While Exxon follows the US rules, the others, all headquartered in Europe, follow rules from across the pond.

The European method, which is governed by the international financial reporting standards, makes companies better reflect the gas industry conditions where the asset is located and marketed.

For example, BG Group lowered its outlook for Henry Hub natural gas price to $US4.3 per million British thermal unit from $US5/MMBtu. Applying this to its expected future discounted cash flows from its shale assets, it wrote down a whopping $1.3 billion, or almost two-thirds of its second quarter operating profit.

US accounting rules, which follow generally accepted accounting principles, allow companies such as Exxon room to maneuver.

Even though it is subject to the same gas price movements, it does not have to "mark to market" its assets and instead can value its assets as long as the gross future cash flow exceed present values.

This has allowed Exxon to keep its balance sheet pretty even though the company chief has gone on record to say they "are losing our shirts" due to low natural gas prices.

While a uniform accounting method is a desirable one enabling a better performance comparison between companies , it appears a long way off.

TOPICS:

A growing series of reports, each focused on a key discussion point for the energy sector, brought to you by the Energy News Bulletin Intelligence team.

A growing series of reports, each focused on a key discussion point for the energy sector, brought to you by the Energy News Bulletin Intelligence team.

editions

ENB CCS Report 2024

ENB’s CCS Report 2024 finds that CCS could be the much-needed magic bullet for Australia’s decarbonisation drive

editions

ENB Cost Report 2023

ENB’s latest Cost Report findings provide optimism as investments in oil and gas, as well as new energy rise.

editions

ENB Future of Energy Report 2023

ENB’s inaugural Future of Energy Report details the industry outlook on the medium-to-long-term future for the sector in the Asia Pacific region.

editions

ENB Cost Report 2021

This industry-wide report aims to understand current cost levels across the energy industry