NEWS ARCHIVE

Environmental agencies reject Barrow proposal

The future of the $11 billion Gorgon gas project has been dealt a major blow with both of Western...

This article is 21 years old. Images might not display.

Both the Environmental Protection Agency and Conservation Commission knocked back the proposal on grounds that the development could harm the island's fragile ecoculture and rare plant and wildlife species.

The responses, and that of the Department of Industry and Resources, were prompted after Gorgon developer ChevronTexaco put up a detailed development plan that included using Barrow Island as a base for processing infrastructure.

The tone of the agency responses needs to be read alongside pointed comments made by Chevron Australia's chief executive, Jay Johnson, last week that: "there is no fall back after Barrow, this is the only option."

Johnson was referring to suggestions that the Gorgon field should be developed without the use of Barrow Island. Johnson dismissed the idea saying that locating the plant on WA's mainland would add $1 billion to the project's cost, ruling out any hope of it being viable.

Jim Limerick, the Chair of the Standing Interagency Committee of Chief Executive Officers (SIAC), which is responsible for coordinating the whole-of-government strategic assessment process, said the government had not yet made a decision on the proposed development, or guaranteed any outcome on the use of Barrow Island by Gorgon.

"However, as there is no established process in WA to strategically assess the environmental, social and economic costs and benefits of significant development proposals such as this, we have sought advice from a range of sources, including public comments, to assist the government," he said.

"The Environmental Protection Authority and the Conservation Commission have advised they consider that access to Barrow Island is not compatible with the island's very significant environmental and conservation values. As requested, those agencies have also recommended appropriate conditions for such access, should the government agree to it."

Dr Limerick said the current process does not replace future assessments under the Environmental Protection Act and the Commonwealth Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act, should the Government give in-principle approval.

The agency responses now go out for six weeks for public comment. After that the State Cabinet must decide whether to give Chevron in-principle approval to use Barrow Island or not.

TOPICS:

A growing series of reports, each focused on a key discussion point for the energy sector, brought to you by the Energy News Bulletin Intelligence team.

A growing series of reports, each focused on a key discussion point for the energy sector, brought to you by the Energy News Bulletin Intelligence team.

editions

Energy News Bulletin Future of Energy Report 2024

With the global energy market in constant development, this report captures the sentiment of key industry players on the future of energy in Australia – and how it has changed through 2024.

editions

ENB CCS Report 2024

ENB’s CCS Report 2024 finds that CCS could be the much-needed magic bullet for Australia’s decarbonisation drive

editions

ENB Cost Report 2023

ENB’s latest Cost Report findings provide optimism as investments in oil and gas, as well as new energy rise.

editions

ENB Future of Energy Report 2023

ENB’s inaugural Future of Energy Report details the industry outlook on the medium-to-long-term future for the sector in the Asia Pacific region.